Archive for January, 2026|Monthly archive page

Book Review: Margaret Atwood, Oryx and Crake

This is my first Margaret Atwood (left) experience. I was gripped. And I was taken somewhere not unfamiliar: a dystopian view of the future. Now bearing in mind this book predates Covid-19, it is quite chilling. Bearing in mind this predates Trump and tech billionaires, doubly so. One has to give her credit for what follows. Once again, please note, I am a novice literary critic and my review here has spoilers. This book is also the first part of a trilogy (the subsequent books are not reviewed).

The story is told through the experiences of two men, Crake and Jimmy. Only Jimmy exists before and after the thing that happens to humanity. Jimmy grows up in a family where his parents work for a corporation, HealthWyzer, that, essentially, makes organic life forms. For example, Happicuppa is coffee plants where the beans all ripen together so can be harvested by machines. However, foremost amongst the animal lifeforms are pigoons – pigs that grow organs for human transplant that can be harvested whilst the animals are still alive. Essentially reusable pigs. But there are many other hybrid-type creatures made by corporations: rakunks (make good pets), wolvogs (great guard creatures), spoatgiders (goat-spider – good for bullet-proof vests), rockulets (absorb water high humidity/let it out in low humidity), snats (snake-rats) and crakers (named after their creator) – humanoids that drop dead at 30, bear no malice, enjoy enhanced immune systems…monetisable.

Jimmy and Crake are friends. In their youth, they experience together some of the worst facets of the digital world they inhabit, including violent and gruesome pornography and executions (hedsoff.com). They also play games such as Blood and Roses (pp89-92), a trading game in which players trade atrocities (blood) for human achievements (roses). This game is part of a wider gaming eco-system of Extinctathon monitored by Maddaddam. And it was from this game that Crake got his name which stuck (his real name was Glenn) from an extinct Australian bird. Jimmy’s codename was Thickney from an Australian double-jointed bird that inhabited cemeteries.

Oryx from the title is rescued from child sex slavery and becomes an intimate companion of both characters. Crake, we discover, is the evil genius heading up RejoovenEsense, the ultimate in unregulated mega corporation designing the future. For example, in this world, there is:

“No more prostitution, no more sexual abuse of children, no haggling over the price, no pimps, no sex slaves. No more rape. The five of them will roister for hours, three of the men standing guard and doing the singing and shouting while the fourth one copulates, turn and turn about. Crake has equipped these women with ultra-strong vulvas – extra skin layers, extra muscles – so they sustain these marathons. It no longer matters who the father of the inevitable child will be, since there is no more property to inherit, no father-son loyalty required for war.” (pp194-5)

Jimmy and Crake have very different university experiences. Crake goes to the elite Watson-Crick Institute: “Once a student there and your future was assured. It was like going to Harvard had been, before it got drowned.” (emphasis added, p203). By contrast, Jimmy went to the down-at-heel Martha Graham Academy: “The Academy had been set up by a clutch of now-dead rich liberal bleeding hearts from Old New York as an Arts-and-Humanities college at some time in the last third of the 20th Century, with special emphasis on Performing Arts – acting, singing, dancing and so forth. To that had been added film-making in the 1980s and Video Arts after that.” (p219).

Where Crake after graduation gets access to mega corporations, Jimmy settles for working in advertising for a company called AnooYoo before being invited by Crake to join him to promote their big product, BlyssPluss: The aim was to produce a single pill that, at one and the same time would:

  • protect the user against all known sexually transmitted diseases, fatal, inconvenient, or merely unsightly;
  • provide unlimited supply of libido and sexual prowess, coupled with generalized sense of energy and well-being thus reducing the frustration and blocked testosterone that led to jealously and violence, and eliminating feelings of low self-worth;
  • prolong youth.

What is not on the label is that prolonged use renders one infertile.

In parallel to this we learn of life after the event in which Jimmy, known now as Snowman, lives in the forest and oversees the security of the Crakers that Crake had entrusted to him with in the post-corporate world. This we discover is only possible because of Crake’s scientific intervention that protects him where others perish. Snowman’s life revolves around trying to find food for himself left behind in old settlements – the corporation compounds – amongst the bodies. But venturing further into the forest and towards these places is dangerous. the Pigoons are now feral and themselves hungry. Finishing off what is left of humanity for the sake of a meal would not bother them.

This book is only marginally about climate change. We know it is hot. And we know that perhaps the East Coast USA flooded due to rising sea levels. We know that corporations and their technologies determine the future. And these corporations are in the hands of people for whom profit and power are central to their thinking. They and the corporations they lead are not founded on an overtly ethical platform. Business is simply business. That said, in true Bond villain style, there is more to it. The power to create life forms is balanced by the power to destroy lifeforms, too. Human, in particular.

Critique

On the face of it this is a straightforward dystopia novel. The world is controlled by corporations seeking to refine humanity to secure profit – through idealized/designer babies, disease control/vaccines/organs, human reproduction, etc. There is no real government or regulation. Something catastrophic happens by accident or design. There is no way back. In this case there is a relative peace because there are few other survivors. In many other dystopian novels, civilization breaks down leading to savagery in pursuit of resources.

The parallel stories work well. Atwood does not expect us to understand fully what is going on until quite late – probably at the point at which the two stories converge. The dystopia is plausible now, in 2026, though perhaps not so much in 2003 when it was first published. Though it is not the first dystopia novel. On that basis, it is not very revealing. Maybe it has not aged very well, or maybe it lacks something to say in a way in which 1985’s The Handmaid’s Tale perhaps does.

The friendship between Crake and Jimmy is explored at length. I have to say whilst Crake and Jimmy explore pornography in their bedrooms I, with my childhood friend, marvelled at coloured vinyl records and Matchbox die cast models (two things that we both collected). I will give Atwood credit here; she understands boys and men as well as any male author understands women and girls. I felt the bond between them. It leads neatly to the conclusion. Crake needed someone whom he could trust to protect his legacy in the event of catastrophe (which seems about 90 per cent certain it was planned rather than accidental).

More interestingly is the subtle surveillance state. There is resistance to the corporations with sporadic violence and internment. If I read it correctly, the Maddaddam movement is the focus of the resistance. Both of the main characters are being monitored and controlled arising from their family involvement in the corporations. Jimmy, for example, is often questioned by the pervasive CorpSeCorps armed security forces. They remind him to stay compliant, not least when they show him a video of the execution of his mother, convicted of treason, having rebelled against the corporation and paid the ultimate price (p302). Though in the video her words were clear: “Goodbye. Remember Killer [Jimmy’s pet rakunk]. I love you. Don’t let me down.” (p303).

Once again, then, Atwood is on top of the surveillance state. Something that is now normalized in China and now increasingly in the USA as the corporations take control of our data. The question for me is a simple one, did I need to read 430 pages of Margaret Atwood prose to reveal what is for me self-evident? The answer is, I think, “it depends”. For too long I have avoided fiction and I had forgotten how important it is for creating alternative worlds (the Sci-Fi genre) or at least taking us into the worlds of others who may have had very different life chances and experiences. More critical though is building narrative around relationships – this novel is particularly good in this respect. A number of years ago I was in a book group and we read quite a bit of women’s literature. Actually, that is the wrong term. It is literature that prioritizes the issues relating to women, primarily family and friends. As a younger man, I was quite dismissive of that literature and rebelled, when it was my turn to select a book by foisting on to others work by Will Self, for example. It is good to see here that Atwood can do men. There is only one female character in the book for a reason; namely, the cause of the event that sees off much of humanity is men. And my goodness, we can see that in the contemporary world where three old men in particular seem to engineering dystopia.

Picture: Margaret Atwood Photo by Piaras Ó Mídheach/Collision via Sportsfile

Book Review: Kim Stanley Robinson, The Ministry for the Future

People have different ways of coping with the climate crisis. Quite a few people just ignore it. Others deny it and actively seek to make it worse. Others expect someone or something else to fix it; surely there is a technological fix? I wake up each morning with the challenge in my head. What can I do more to change things?

A response has been to seek solace in art, theatre and music. Indeed, I have a playlist. Every visit to a gallery or exhibition is filtered through the climate lens. And now it is novels – not a medium that I have indulged much. I was never a great reader of novels as a child. When I grew up I immersed myself in non-fiction and newspapers. There is a point to my sudden interest. I have an objective. But first I have to read what are seen as the significant books of fiction that deal with the climate crisis. I also have to learn how to critique literature. This is not a skill that I currently possess. Please bear that in mind when reading. Also note, there are countless spoilers in this text.

My first book to review is Kim Stanley Robinson’s, The Ministry for the Future. It is an epic. The paperback has a small font and has 563 pages. There are two main characters. There is a lot of implicit violence. It is also a book unusual in explaining economic and innovation concepts; for example, discounted cash flow (p 131); the Jevons Paradox (p 165); Gini Coefficient/equality measures (p73); MMT (Ch73); Bretton Woods (Ch50) and the International criminal court (Ch56), etc. There are also free lessons in glaciology and geoengineering amongst other scientific concepts.

The first of the book’s two main characters, Frank May, is an aid worker in Uttar Pradesh. It is 6am and the temperature is already 38 degrees and the humidity 35 per cent. We know that heat and humidity are a lethal combination. And so it proved. When the power failed all life-saving air conditioning shut off. During the course of the next few hours 2 million people died. What we learn from this is that 2 million people is the trigger for action. No state can sit back when 2 million of its citizens die from what is not a natural disaster.

The Indian Government’s near first response was to execute a programme of geoengineering – depositing particulates into the upper atmosphere to deflect the sun and cool the surface. This contravened the Paris Agreement of 2015. No state should unilaterally undertake a programme of geoengineering where the impacts are unknown and cross-border. But they did it.

Frank May improbably survives, but his whole life is haunted by the experience. His post traumatic stress disorder impacts on those around him. His focus is on bringing about change by whatever means. He makes contact with an organisation called The Children of Kali, a direct action grouping that targets the world’s climate villains; namely, those who caused climate change and those who perpetuate it. The bosses of oil companies require 24 hour protection. The owners of private jets do not sleep easy. Diesel ships and aeroplanes will sink or crash on the so-called “accident day”. That, at least, sees an end to mass aviation.

Rejected by the Children of Kali, Frank kidnaps the book’s second main character, Mary Murphy, the head of the recently established UN entity, The Ministry for the Future based in Zurich. He is not very good at kidnapping since he allows the kidnapping to take place in her own apartment, one which is monitored by the local police, she being a target – by the right for threatening their profits or the left for not doing enough to threaten their profits. Before the arrival of the police, Frank confronts her with the “left” position. The Ministry is not doing enough to change things. It is incremental, transparent and easily captured. He tells her about the Children of Kali and the kind of action needed to bring about real change.

On the arrival of the police, Frank disappears through a back window and goes underground until he is eventually apprehended by the police after defending migrants from an attack by local fascists – naturally, immigration is a real flashpoint, and immigrants very much a target. Frank is sent to prison for the kidnapping and his involvement in the death of a man on the beach whom he hit with a large piece of wood.

Scary though the the kidnap experience was, Mary knew that Frank was right. She discussed with her Chief of Staff, Badim Bahadur, whether the Ministry had any black ops, not dissimilar to the Children of Kali. He was not about to disclose any activities of the sort, but the very reticence suggested that the Ministry had such an arm. This, of course, leads to questions about who is responsible for what? Is the Ministry sinking ships or the Children of Kali, or some other radical outfit with little faith in mainstream politics?

A core vehicle for change is the carbon coin. It is discussed extensively in the book. It has key features; for example it has to be supported by central banks, is securitised by the creation of long-term bonds, it is rendered by blockchain technology. It works whereby: “Every ton [sic] of carbon not burned, or sequestered in a way that would be certified to be real for an agreed-upon time, one century being typical…you are given a carbon coin…the central banks would guarantee it at a certain minimum price, they would support a floor so it couldn’t crash. But also it could rise above the floor as people get a sense of its value, in the usual way of currencies in the currency exchange markets.” (p174). It is a form of carbon quantitative easing. And it is a market-driven mechanism.

The carbon coin is based on a paper (actually a series of papers/essays) by Delton Chen (p172 – https://tinyurl.com/4c27dj9a) author of the key paper: Chen, D. B., van der Beek, J., & Cloud, J. (2017). Climate mitigation policy as a system solution: addressing the risk cost of carbon. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment7(3), 233–274. https://tinyurl.com/5ervkk74

The cover brands the “Ministry…” as “one of Barak Obama’s favourite books of the year”. We all know how important that endorsement has been in recent years. Whilst this may be good for sales, I am not sure if the scenario presented has the legs the author and Obama think and hope for. The first part of the book is apocalyptic, for sure. Lots of bad things happen to people; obviously the heatwave that starts the book results in mass death, but the terrorism/state-sponsored terrorism takes its toll, too. We do not ever get to know who did what. Curiously, the terrorism seems to go without investigation. We do find out who may be behind much of the terror, however; namely, brown people.

The second half of the book simply reassures. Yes, the climate crisis remains present, but the trajectory starts to go in the right direction. Global emissions are cut seriously, not least by the incentive provided by the carbon coin. The scientist innovate in ways that give hope. Though this part is difficult for lay readers like myself to judge relative to the carbon coin initiative (which has at least been subject to peer review). Some of the glacier adaptations do seem fanciful not just scientifically, but also geopolitically. Admittedly, the book was written before the second Trump administration and the current phase of the Ukraine conflict, but even before then, it would have seemed optimistic.

Kim Stanley Robinson, Source: Christopher Michel

I suppose my biggest misgiving is Robinson’s belief/hope that already-occurring warming can be reversed. Tipping points are recognised, but they do seem to be glossed over. Migration is recognised, of course, but it is still a “problem” to be handled by efficient bureaucracy. There is, equally, not much thought given to food security, biodiversity and shifting global alliances. Without the security of world order, much of what is described in the second half of the book is unlikely to be feasible. And I have no confidence that that world order will be maintained. For example, I worry particularly about food security, centred as it is now around global value chains, limited genetic diversity of core foodstuffs such as grain, rice, bananas, etc. Interested readers should read Tim Lang. Hungry people do not play be the rules. And because of the trajectory, the second half of the book loses its momentum, suspense and mission. For the final few chapters I was waiting for something to happen. But it did not because the author had already determined that the world had been saved and that one of the main characters can actually retire and travel the world in an airship! The book, therefore, has a very long and unrewarding tail.

Anyone needing more – and there is more – should read clever review using an ideal-type approach to criticism, see the work of Solarpunk – Hacker. Worth a good few minutes of your time.